5.2 The governing equation for a beam-column
Consider the deformed beam-column element in Fig. 5.1. We must differentiate the
forces in the deformed and undeformed axis of the beam. The axial force
versus normal force
and
the transverse shear force
versus shear force
are depicted in Fig. 5.1.
Figure 5.1:
Normal, shear, axial and transverse shear forces
|
The beam-column theory uses the Bernoulli5.1-Euler5.2 theory kinematic assumption that the curvature
can be considered equal to the second derivative of the deflected longitudinal axis
.
 |
|
|
(5.1) |
The relationship of Eq. (A.26) between the forces referred to the deformed and undeformed axis is
![$\displaystyle \left[
\begin{array}{c}
S \\
H
\end{array}\right] =
\left[
\begi...
...s\varphi}
\end{array}\right]
\left[
\begin{array}{c}
N \\
Q
\end{array}\right]$](img506.png) |
|
|
(5.2) |
The ``small slope'' assumption,
, allows us to conclude that
 |
|
|
(5.3) |
and the relationship between the forces referred to the deformed and undeformed axis
can be rewritten according to [RH95] and [PW94] in the form
![$\displaystyle \left[
\begin{array}{c}
S \\
H
\end{array}\right] =
\left[
\begi...
...phi & {1}
\end{array}\right]
\left[
\begin{array}{c}
N \\
Q
\end{array}\right]$](img509.png) |
|
|
(5.4) |
Figure 5.2:
Deformed beam elements with the axial and normal forces
|
Now we consider Fig. 5.2 c, and project the forces onto the direction of z-axis:
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
(5.5) |
Taking into account the assumption of Eq. (5.3), we rewrite Eq. (5.5):
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
(5.6) |
After reducing Eq. (5.6),
 |
|
|
(5.7) |
or
 |
|
|
(5.8) |
From Eq. (5.4) we have
 |
|
|
(5.9) |
Using the previous equation, we can rewrite
the equilibrium equation (5.8) in the form
 |
|
|
(5.10) |
Now we project the forces onto the direction of x-axis:
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
(5.11) |
With the assumption of Eq. (5.3),
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
(5.12) |
Reducing this equation gives
 |
|
|
(5.13) |
or
 |
|
|
(5.14) |
From Eq. (5.4)
 |
|
|
(5.15) |
Using Eqs. (5.15) and (5.14), we get
 |
|
|
(5.16) |
Next we write the equation of the sum of the moments and the moments of the forces acting about the end
point of the element shown in Fig. 5.2 c:
 |
|
|
(5.17) |
Here,
is the length of the element.
Hence
, and we rewrite Eq. (5.17):
 |
|
|
(5.18) |
Due to the orthogonality of Eq. (A.27), we can write an inverse relationship
to Eq. (5.4)
![$\displaystyle \left[
\begin{array}{c}
N \\
Q
\end{array}\right] =
\left[
\begi...
...phi & {1}
\end{array}\right]
\left[
\begin{array}{c}
S \\
H
\end{array}\right]$](img531.png) |
|
|
(5.19) |
where the expression for the shear force
is
 |
|
|
(5.20) |
Figure 5.3:
Components of the normal force
|
Replacing from Eq. (5.18) by the expression (5.20), we obtain
 |
|
|
(5.21) |
Hence
, and from Eq. (5.16)
 |
|
|
(5.22) |
Differentiating Eq. (5.21) we have
 |
|
|
(5.23) |
Replacing
in the above equation by the expression from Eq. (5.10), and
by the expression
, we obtain
 |
|
|
(5.24) |
or
 |
|
|
(5.25) |
For a constant axial force
and a constant
we obtain
 |
|
|
(5.26) |
 |
|
|
(5.27) |
The governing differential equations take the form
 |
|
|
(5.28) |
where the minus sign denotes a tensile axial force (
) and
the plus sign a compressive axial force (
).
Figure 5.4:
Bending moments of a beam-column
![\begin{figure}\begin{center}
\begin{overpic}[scale=.6]
{joonised/piki_m.eps}
\p...
...overline{x} -
x\right)dx}_{M^{I}} + Sw$}
\end{overpic}\end{center}
\end{figure}](img550.png) |
The governing equations (5.28) for the beam-column transverse displacement can
be written as
![$\displaystyle \left[EI_{y}{w}^{\prime\prime}\right]^{\prime\prime} {\mp} {\vert}
S_{x}{\vert}{w}^{\prime\prime} - q_{z}\left(x\right) = 0$](img551.png) |
|
|
(5.29) |
and for a constant
, we obtain
![$\displaystyle \left[{w}^{\prime\prime}\right]^{\prime\prime} {\mp} {\vert}
\fra...
...EI_{y}}{\vert}{w}^{\prime\prime} -
\frac{q_{z}\left(x\right)}{EI_{y}} = 0 \quad$](img552.png) |
|
|
(5.30)
|
where the minus sign marks a tensile axial force (
) and
the plus sign a compressive axial force (
).
Equation (5.30) is the differential equation governing the deflection w of
a beam-column member with a constant
, subjected to a constant axial force
at any end restraint.
In a second-order analysis, the total deflection w is calculated (see Fig. 5.4).
The total bending moment
is the sum of the bending moment
of
undeformed geometry of the member and the moment Sw (S - axial load, w - displacement) due to the
deformed geometry of the member shown in Fig. 5.4 b. The moment is said to be amplified.
 |
|
|
(5.31) |
The axial force
can be presented with the displacements
and
:
![$\displaystyle S {\approx} {\,} N = - EA\left[u^{\prime} +
\frac{1}{2}\left(w^{\prime}\right)^{2}\right]$](img556.png) |
|
|
(5.32)
|
where
is a large
Kármán5.3-type deflection and
is the axial stiffness.
andres
2014-09-09