Consider the deformed beam-column element in Fig. 5.1. We must differentiate the
forces in the deformed and undeformed axis of the beam. The axial force
versus normal force
and
the transverse shear force
versus shear force
are depicted in Fig. 5.1.
The beam-column theory uses the Bernoulli5.1-Euler5.2 theory kinematic assumption that the curvature
can be considered equal to the second derivative of the deflected longitudinal axis
.
The relationship of Eq. (A.26) between the forces referred to the deformed and undeformed axis is
, allows us to conclude that
Now we project the forces onto the direction of x-axis:
is the length of the element.
Hence
, and we rewrite Eq. (5.17):
is
, and from Eq. (5.16)
in the above equation by the expression from Eq. (5.10), and
by the expression
, we obtain
For a constant axial force
and a constant
we obtain
) and
the plus sign a compressive axial force (
).
The governing equations (5.28) for the beam-column transverse displacement can
be written as
, we obtain
) and
the plus sign a compressive axial force (
).
Equation (5.30) is the differential equation governing the deflection w of
a beam-column member with a constant
, subjected to a constant axial force
at any end restraint.
In a second-order analysis, the total deflection w is calculated (see Fig. 5.4).
The total bending moment
is the sum of the bending moment
of
undeformed geometry of the member and the moment Sw (S - axial load, w - displacement) due to the
deformed geometry of the member shown in Fig. 5.4 b. The moment is said to be amplified.
can be presented with the displacements
and
:
is a large
Kármán5.3-type deflection and
is the axial stiffness.